SmallGovCon Week in Review: June 22-26, 2026

Posted on by

Happy Friday! With June wrapping up, we’ve officially reached the halfway point of the year. Mid-year is the perfect time for federal government contractors to focus on the goals ahead and prepare for new opportunities in the months to come. Here’s to finishing June strong and carrying that momentum into a productive and successful second half of 2026! We hope you have a wonderful weekend.

This week in federal government contracting news, a good chunk of the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (aka “FAR 2.0” or the “RFO”) makes its way into formal rulemaking procedures, NASA expands total awards and introduces thousands of new awardees for SEWP (Solutions for Enterprise-Wide Procurement)–NASA’s premier Government-Wide Acquisition Contract, the White House accelerates the governmentwide shift to post-quantum cryptography and stirs up some controversy with a no-bid contract award for its Reflecting Pool renovations, and GAO identifies some anticipated procurement challenges of cloud computing and also, reflects on 2025’s FraudNet Activity Report. But that’s certainly not all. Take a look at this week’s articles for more on these and other happenings in the federal procurement landscape this week.

Continue reading…

Formal Revolution: FAR Council Releases Proposed Formal Rules to Start RFO Rulemaking Process

Posted on by

The FAR Council has released its first batch of proposed rules to amend the Federal Register to implement the changes to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to implement the executive order on Restoring Common Sense to Federal Procurement. In this post, we will provide an overview of how the RFO is being implemented as part of the formal rulemaking process. Overall, the proposed regulation seems to follow the vast majority of the proposed language that was already issued under the RFO. We’ve discussed some of those changes in past blog posts. For background, our earlier posts regarding various aspects of the RFO can be found here: Executive Order, Overview of FAR 2.0, FAR Part 6, FAR Part 19 and the Once 8(a) Rule under Part 19, FAR Part 12, FAR Part 15, FAR Part 33, . But this post notes some changes as compared to the original version of the RFO.

Continue reading…

“I Could Have Competed” Won’t Cut It: COFC Requires Showing Contractor Could Perform Work if it Wants to Protest Solicitation Terms 

Posted on by

You have your eye on a solicitation. You know the work, you know the customer, and you are certain that you would be a front-runner for the award. Then, you learn that the agency is limiting competition for the procurement, and you can no longer compete for the contract. Immediately, you think that the agency must have made a mistake. After all, you were fully prepared to submit a proposal and perform the work. But is believing you could have competed for the contract and won the award enough to satisfy the requirements for filing a bid protest? A recent COFC decision answers this question. 

Continue reading…

GovCon FAQs: What Costs Can I Exclude From Limitations on Subcontracting Calculations?

Posted on by

If your small business performs federal government contracts, chances are, you’ve already calculated your small business’s compliance with the applicable limitation on subcontracting (LoS) a time or two. But whether you’re new to the LoS equation–or you’ve long since mastered that math–knowing which costs you can exclude from your calculations is vital. Indeed, such can impact everything from the accuracy of a bidder’s regulatory compliance representations and certifications to a contractor’s critical contract performance and subcontracting decisions. In fact, under current SBA affiliation regulations, LoS compliance can even provide a defense to certain contract-specific findings of affiliation. But calculating LoS compliance and determining exactly which costs to include and exclude on a given contract is not always easy or straightforward. And that’s why we so frequently get this question and break down the answer in this article.

Continue reading…

SmallGovCon Week in Review: June 15-19, 2026

Posted on by

Juneteenth is a day to celebrate freedom, reflect on history, and recognize how far we’ve come as a country. Observed each year on June 19, it marks the day in 1865 when enslaved people in Texas finally learned they were free—more than two years after the Emancipation Proclamation was issued.

Whether you’re attending a local event, spending time with family, or simply taking a moment to learn more about the holiday, we hope you have a wonderful weekend. Happy Juneteenth!

This week in federal contracting news includes stories on the recent DEI order, use of AI in government procurement, and the first look at the upcoming NDAA defense spending bill.

Continue reading…

GAO Sustains Protest Due to Agency’s Inadequate Documentation and Unequal Evaluation of Offerors 

Posted on by

As regular SmallGovCon readers surely know, federal agencies have a great deal of discretion when procuring products and services. Protesters are often facing an uphill battle in attempting to demonstrate an agency abused that discretion in making an award. This is because typically, so long as the agency properly documents its decision making process, sticks to the solicitation terms, and there is documentation in the record that reasonably supports the agency’s decision, GAO will rule in the agency’s favor. Nevertheless, there are occasions when the agency will apply evaluation criteria unevenly, or base its decision on facts or considerations that are not allowed under the Solicitation. This is precisely what happened in a recent GAO protest which resulted in a win for the protester, and serves as a great reminder for contractors as to what situations may result in a successful bid protest.

Continue reading…

Breaking: SBA Proposes to Remove Social Disadvantage Presumption for 8(a) Program

Posted on by

SBA is proposing to amend its 8(a) Program rules to “remove the rebuttable presumption that individuals belonging to certain designated groups are socially disadvantaged and set forth revised standards for individuals establishing social disadvantage.” This proposed rule continues the trend that has been building since the Ultima decision in 2023. In 2023, a federal court said that the rebuttable presumption of social disadvantage under the 8(a) is unconstitutional as it violates the right to equal protection. Based on that decision, SBA stopped relying on the presumption of social disadvantage. Three years later, SBA is proposing to formally eliminate any mention of the presumption from the regulations. SBA would replace the individual social disadvantage narrative with a test that looks to whether a person experienced discrimination on the basis of race through programs like affirmative action.

Here are some key points from the proposed rule.

Continue reading…